Thanks to the partnerships involving states, tribes, conservation organizations and private landowners galvanized under the ESA, the Service explains it is now able to propose turning management of all gray wolves back to the states and tribes that have been so central to the species’ recovery.
“The facts are clear and indisputable, the gray wolf no longer meets the definition of a threatened or endangered species,” said DOI Acting Secretary David Bernhardt. “Today the wolf is thriving on its vast range and it is reasonable to conclude it will continue to do so in the future. Today’s action puts us one step closer to transitioning the extraordinary effort that we have invested in gray wolf recovery to other species who actually need the protections of the Endangered Species Act, leaving the states to carry on the legacy of wolf conservation.”
That’s the good news. The bad? If recent history is any indication, the delisting process will drag its way through the courts as the animal rights extremists and anti-hunters will, no doubt, continue their quest to keep the gray wolf on the ESA, seemingly forever. These groups have fought every effort to let the states manage their growing wolf populations. And, frankly, the groups have been quite successful at blocking attempts to return wolf management to the states.
As these groups pushed their legal attempts to keep wolves listed, the NRA, Safari Club International and other pro-hunting organizations gained intervenor status in these suits to help vindicate the scientific management of the wolves through state fish and wildlife agencies.
“For years,” the NRA-ILA article explained, “the NRA has been working to ensure that sound wildlife management practices implemented by the states, and not federal politics, govern the control of wolf populations in the United States.”
The science and the ESA are clearly on the side of delisting the gray wolf. According to the USFWS announcement, “The measure for listing a species under the ESA is whether wolves are in danger of extinction or at risk of becoming so in the foreseeable future, throughout all or a significant portion of their current range. The ESA does not require wolves to be present throughout all of their former range or for populations to be at historical levels for delisting to occur.”
It also notes that peer-reviewed studies on factors such as habitat and prey availability, gray wolf adaptability (including to changing climate conditions), recovery activities and post-delisting regulatory mechanisms, and predictions about how these may affect the wolves in the future are consistent in guiding the Service’s decision to delist. "By any scientific measure, wolves no longer meet the ESA’s standard for protection."
NRA Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) Associate Litigation Counsel Michael Jean offered an estimate on what the timeline might look like. “It took the USFWS 15 months to sort through grizzly bear comments during that species’ delisting process before releasing a Final Rule. And add a couple years of litigation on to the end of that.”
NRA-ILA and the NRA Hunters’ Leadership Forum will continue to follow this important issue, one that at its core is about the right of states to manage their wildlife under the extremely successful North American Model of Wildlife Conservation.
■ ■ ■
About the Author: Brian McCombie is a field editor and editorial contributor for the NRA's American Hunter and this website, NRAHLF.org. He writes about firearms and gear for the NRA's Shooting Illustrated website, as well handling public relations and marketing for companies and manufacturers in the shooting sports industry. He is a member of the National Rifle Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation. Brian likes hunting hogs, shooting 1911s chambered in 10 mm and .45 ACP, watching the Chicago Bears and relaxing with Squinchy, his orange tabby cat.